Post-Modernism: What is it?

Post-modernism is the artistic movement which, in essence, portrays a “…reaction to the assumed certainty of scientific, or objective, efforts to explain reality.” The movement relies upon the interpretation of reality and what it means to an artist, author, or creator individually.

The Simpsons (1989-present) is perhaps the most noticeable use of the post-modernism movement, providing commentary on the status of 'the American Dream'. (See http://www.onpostmodernism.com/television for further television examples)
The Simpsons (1989-present) is perhaps the most noticeable use of the post-modernism movement, providing commentary on the status of ‘the American Dream’. 
Another example is Bansky's "One Nation Under CCTV", a commentary to remind citizens that the government is always watching.
Another example is Bansky’s “One Nation Under CCTV” (2008-2009), a commentary to remind citizens that the government is always watching.

The post-modernism movement, furthermore, is arguably a feature of today’s remix culture. The intertextual references the post-modern examples above relay to an audience are influenced by the social, political, cultural, and economic happenings of our world, and are copied to some extent from this source material. For example, “The Simpsons” is based upon a dysfunctional family attempting to live ‘the American Dream’. Spanning over 26 seasons, the Simpson family engages in everyday family activities with entertaining, made-for-television humour that often focuses on or interprets world events and stereotypes.

The post-modernism movement, in this way is a feature of remix culture, appropriating source material, the artist interpreting it in their own, individual way, and publishing it as another original work of creativity.

Advertisements

Introduction to Remix Culture

The notion that everything – whether it be music, film, products, and further forms of artistic material – is a copy, paired alongside with the harsh statutory developments in intellectual property and copyright law, suggests that remix culture is a significant aspect of our day to day lives. By a process of appropriating “original” material , transforming and combining it to create something new, remixing (or sampling) has become a mainstream outlet of creativity. What is original artwork is now largely contested.

Remix culture is largely concerned with developing an artists own aesthetic reusing old or already published material to build something new (explored in great detail in Brett Gaylor’s RIP: A Remix Manifesto (2008)). As Kirby Ferguson (2010) relates it:

Hollywood’s greatest achievement is transforming the old into the new by following the conventions of genres and sub-genres, preconceived novels and franchises to reinvent films. Everything finds its own identity from the influence of something else.

The way that we consume films, music, artwork and the like, however, is affecting how we create the remix culture we are prone to. Our basic processes of consumption (streaming, downloading, borrowing from friends and family, etc.) are becoming illegal, as the copyright owners invite us to enjoy a controlled level of interaction and engagement with our favourite TV shows, films, and songs.

The increasing illegality of remix culture aims to allow authors to retain the exclusive rights of their artworks, but is this limiting and possibly even threatening creativity?

Throughout the course of this semester I aim to develop an opinion in regards to the aesthetic, legal, consumer, and ethical and moral implications of our remix culture.